Opinions and discussion on content management and document management by two of the biggest guys in the business. *Measured by combined weight

OpenText Fills Another Bubble With Metastorm

Follow Marko

Follow Lee

Disclaimer

The opinions shared here represent those of the contributor themselves and not those of their employers nor that of Big Men On Content as a whole.

OpenText announced the acquisition of BPM pure play Metastorm. Much like the StreamServe acquisition from late last year this fills a gap in their overall business application portfolio.

OpenText buying Metastorm is in some respects an acknowledgment of the weight non-document BPM integration now carries in enterprise architecture relative to the pull on ECM software that it can create. IBM in particular has invested heavily in the last few years with a similar acquisition in Lombardi. Some might also argue that as far back as 2006 the FileNet acquisition by IBM was as much about their BPM as ECM though I will admit this is a bit of a stretch.

With this latest move, BPM acquisitions again appear one sided with the bigger  portfolios adding up and coming process players. It remains to be seen if the independent pure play BPM’s (Pega, Global 360, Appian, etc.) will continue this trend or as I believe turn the tables and extend their own capabilities with content services. Either through close partnerships or out right acquisition.

Lastly, one might think this acquisition overtly overlaps existing capabilities. The fact is however that the former LiveLink BPM Server was not well suited to compete against the likes of Metastorm in human centric BPM scenarios. This buy then better positions OpenText for these opportunities which often expose broad tangential content needs.

Tagged as: , , , , , , ,

Categorised in: Content Management, Enterprise Content Management

1 Response »

  1. thanks for the notes correcting my parenthetical reference of Savvion as an IBM acquisition. They were acquired by Progress around the same time. It did offer the chance to add a FileNet reference though that came to mind later.:)

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: