<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warning to CMS Vendors &#8211; SharePoint Doesn&#8217;t Need You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bigmenoncontent.com/2008/02/14/warning-to-cms-vendors-sharepoint-doesnt-need-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bigmenoncontent.com/2008/02/14/warning-to-cms-vendors-sharepoint-doesnt-need-you/</link>
	<description>Opinions and discussions on content management by two of the biggest guys in the business.(measured by weight not volume)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:33:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: document projects team</title>
		<link>http://bigmenoncontent.com/2008/02/14/warning-to-cms-vendors-sharepoint-doesnt-need-you/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[document projects team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bmoc.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would agree and I think that the convergence of ECM with CCM is going to bring out some interesting consolidation in the market. 

Conditions are right for big companies to go shopping at the moment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree and I think that the convergence of ECM with CCM is going to bring out some interesting consolidation in the market. </p>
<p>Conditions are right for big companies to go shopping at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Dallas</title>
		<link>http://bigmenoncontent.com/2008/02/14/warning-to-cms-vendors-sharepoint-doesnt-need-you/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Dallas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 13:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bmoc.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed - they may never take that component on - I would say that  the other ECM vendors haven&#039;t been dealing with that in any meaningful way either. For content creation, revision and transactional processing of the unstructured data - they are well on their way to parity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed &#8211; they may never take that component on &#8211; I would say that  the other ECM vendors haven&#8217;t been dealing with that in any meaningful way either. For content creation, revision and transactional processing of the unstructured data &#8211; they are well on their way to parity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: document projects team</title>
		<link>http://bigmenoncontent.com/2008/02/14/warning-to-cms-vendors-sharepoint-doesnt-need-you/#comment-176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[document projects team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bmoc.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect it is going to be a while before Sharepoint can properly handle high volume print stream content though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect it is going to be a while before Sharepoint can properly handle high volume print stream content though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Forecasting the Future of Documentum and SharePoint &#171; Word of Pie</title>
		<link>http://bigmenoncontent.com/2008/02/14/warning-to-cms-vendors-sharepoint-doesnt-need-you/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forecasting the Future of Documentum and SharePoint &#171; Word of Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 02:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bmoc.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] has been said here, and elsewhere, that for the ECM vendors to survive SharePoint, they can&#8217;t just offer architectural [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has been said here, and elsewhere, that for the ECM vendors to survive SharePoint, they can&#8217;t just offer architectural [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embracing SharePoint, Recipe for Death? &#171; Word of Pie</title>
		<link>http://bigmenoncontent.com/2008/02/14/warning-to-cms-vendors-sharepoint-doesnt-need-you/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Embracing SharePoint, Recipe for Death? &#171; Word of Pie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 04:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bmoc.wordpress.com/?p=33#comment-13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] list, such as I read any blog &#8220;regularly&#8221; these days given my recent workload.&#160; It mentions into the perils of ECM vendors hitching their wagon to SharePoint with the observation that Microsoft doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] list, such as I read any blog &#8220;regularly&#8221; these days given my recent workload.&nbsp; It mentions into the perils of ECM vendors hitching their wagon to SharePoint with the observation that Microsoft doesn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

